Tuesday, December 12, 2006

How Political Correctness Blinds Us to the Evil of Islamic Terrorism

After listening to a lot of Rush, he has enlightened me on a rather interesting trait in the reporting and portrayal of our enemies in the War on Terror.

If there is one label that can almost instantly destroy a person's reputation in today's culture, it has to be either "racist", "bigot", or the dreadful "intolerant". If a person in the public eye is called one of these names, without extensive proof against the claim, the person's reputation will be assassinated, in effect.

We live in a culture in total fear of offending anybody, ruled by political correctness. The minorities are treated as a china tea cup even if doing so throws the majority around like a rag doll. The rules that we are told to live by are quite obvious even if not stated.

1. Your faith is your faith, and nothing more. The truth you hold doesn't extend past your nose.
2. Since there is only a bunch of individual truths, every person should treat the other person's view as no more or no less true than there own.

These are the rules, and people are told. A small hint of a belief that there is only one true faith, and there's gonna be some gnashing of teeth.

So how does all this tie into my title? The way this war is viewed by many people in the media and politics is different from any other war America has fought. In wars past, the line between the good guys and the bad guys was distinct. America is good, Nazi Germany is bad. America is good, the USSR is bad. One of the reasons of America's success was the undivided support by Americans for their troops and country. However, in the War in Iraq, we aren't fighting an enemy state, we are fighting an enemy that is motivated by its faith. Referring back to "Rule 1" above, this is where the problem arises.

All the Islamic Terrorists fighting us right now, whether Al Qaeda or other group, are really just fascists, that is, they seek to eventually establish a world governed by Islam. They are Islamofascists. But because of the secular humanists' emphasis on tolerance of all faiths and relative truth of all faiths (political correctness), these terrorists get to hide behind the cloak of religion and therefore get all the benefits of tolerance.

Because of this, the portrayal of these terrorists is totally warped. Rather than evil, murderous human beings motivated by radical extremist ideals, they are presented as "gun men" simply upset at all the travesties America has committed. They can decapitate American citizens on camera and use children as human bombs, and the media still won't call them what they are. Why? Again, because the terrorists are represented by another religion and many media people and politicians have adopted an agenda of relativism that refuses to distinguish between good and evil. Take that back, they do sometimes make this distinction, its just that America is always the one in the wrong.

If political correctness was nothing more than being respectful of other people, it would be not only good, but honorable. However, in its fight to be totally tolerant, totally unoffensive, it will intentionally blind itself if evil bares its ugly face.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

So expensive...and so offensive!

OK, so this post has nothing to do with the original goal of this blog, but as you can see, I changed my title to allow for this story. I just couldn't leave this one out. And now I have the freedom to post other stuff.

But anyway, there are times when we are left only to chuckle at the latest happenings of our culture. Thanks to Rush Limbaugh for making my day a little brighter with this story. This ought to make your's brighter too. This is sure to leave you laughing hysterically on one hand and shaking your head in disbelief on the other. Here's the story:

Basically, the famous "Got Milk?" organization came up with a very clever marketing campaign to use in San Fransisco. The idea was to place adhesive cardboard strips, emblazened with the "Got Milk?" logo, and smelling of cookies, on the local bus stop shelters. I for one, think that is an awesome idea. No body wouldn't want a bus stop smelling like cookies! And yet I stood corrected. There were some "complaints" brought to the Municipal Transportation Agency, as spokesperson Maggie Lynch said, "We got complaints" and "It is controversial".

Now, I want you to take 10 seconds to come up with some possible complaints that would make this, of all things, controversial. (1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8...9...10) OK, times up. I don't think any of you came up with a complaint this outrageous. There were complaints that opposed the cookie-smelling strip because "the ads could be offensive to the poor and homeless who can't afford to buy sweet treats".

Let it be loudly declared that it is now possible to be offended by the reminder that I can't afford something. Can you believe this? Imagine if we were to actually live our lives with this ability.

I'm at a stop light in my gray '89 Honda Accord, and a BMW Z9 pulls up beside me... HOW OFFENSIVE!

I'm at Guitar Center and I see a vintage 1958 Gibson Les Paul Goldtop Reissue... O, THE HUMANITY!

I'm still laughing.

Enjoy

Caleb